BTW, I usually designate all of this on the print file page where I store the originals so that I can easily match them up later. Similarly, each frame initially gets named sequentially(frame 1, etc) but I will then often go back and append additional details such as the names of the people or a general description of what's in the frame.
If I have multiple rolls from the same occasion, I will usually make a sub-folder for each roll-it's usually designated "roll 1" etc, but might get additional information as to what is on that specific roll. That description could be something like "trip to xxx fall 2018", "flowers spring 2019" or "family reunion summer 2009."(that one is my go to reference for Kodachrome :) ). In my case, I will typically name the folder with the date processed, the film type, and-most importantly-a quick description of the general comments. Incidentally, I've noticed the same effect to a less extent on the Epson and Canon flatbeds that make a separate pass for IR channel scanning-Nikons avoid this problem by collecting the IR channel with the RGB channels.Īs for organizing-I usually scan things as I have them processed, and don't scan the complete rolls. This can result in a small reduction in noise from a "thick" negative or slide, but almost always with a loss of sharpness. In practical use, I've found that even higher end consumer grade scanners(I've used an older 35mm/120 Canon flatbed, an Epson V700, an ancient Polaroid Sprintscan, and Nikon Coolscan III, V, and 8000 models) typically don't have great repeatability in how the scan head/film holder(depending on the scanner design) gets positioned from pass to pass. The analytical chemist in me looks at signal/noise ratio all the time, and in my mind multi-pass scanning SHOULD improve the scanner performance by collecting multiple samples at the same site.
Vuescan does offer "multi-pass" scanning. I have never used Silverfast beyond the demo version, but have used Vuescan extensively.
0 kommentar(er)
